98-99% effective

Discuss the triumph or heartache of not having more children, and the struggle to make that decision.

Moderators: JennyK, nomore, dwtegli

98-99% effective

Postby tlm5999 » Aug 16, 2006 3:14 pm

Anybody that is interested in being less scared? Natural Family Planning is 98-99% effective in preventing pregnancy. It's better than a condom. And you know what your body is doing without all of the chemicals. It is really easy to learn and follow. Best of all if on the extreme off chances you do want another child you can still have one. It works while Breastfeeding and during premenopause. With regular and irregular cycles. It is Not the old rhythm method. Even if you don't use it, you will know more about how your body works. Did you know you can know when you ovulate to within 48hrs? What about that pregnancy can only occur in a maximum of an 8 day window in your cycle? That takes into account that 48 hr discrepency? If anyone is interested I can try and find an instructor in your area. If I can't find one for you I am an instructor and fellow HGer as well.
Valin 05-15-03 HG
Liam 11-19-04 HG
Anna-Marie 9-3-06 Lost an angel
Jonathan Declan 12/28/06 Lost a twin
Declan James 8-8-07 HG
Joseph 6-4-09 non-HG
Image
tlm5999
Opinionated HGer
 
Posts: 671
Joined: Aug 04, 2006 8:33 am
Location: Topeka, KS, USA

Postby nomore » Aug 16, 2006 8:32 pm

I used this method for about a year before we TTC my 1st. The pill was not agreeing at all with me... we were sick of condoms, and didnt want anything else more permanaent or hormonal related. It was great. However, having had severe HG, and severe pre-e, it just doesnt seem safe enough for me long term now that our pregnancy days need to be over. :)
nomore
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4418
Joined: May 30, 2004 12:32 pm

Postby BrandiJK » Aug 17, 2006 9:42 am

Not thatit matters no, Dh got fixed, but I looked into this method. If your periods are too all over the place, it is not recommended (I had a 30-65 day cycle, too much variance).

Hope this works for lots of people though! I know that many of us can't handle the chemicals :(
The only thing worth stealing is a kiss from a sleeping child.
BrandiJK
Master of HG
 
Posts: 4547
Joined: Aug 05, 2005 12:38 pm
Location: California, East Bay Area

Postby PamelaRose » Aug 17, 2006 4:20 pm

I was the same, Brandi - I had anywhere from 45-90-120 day cycles back when we were ttc our first, and NFP wasn't an option. But it would be a great choice for someone who is more regular and who isn't comfortable with birth control or sterilization.
Pamela

4-Time HG Survivor
*Brody (8-11-98 )
*Avery (1-24-01)
*Reilly (12-16-02)
PamelaRose
Forums Administrator
 
Posts: 6263
Joined: Apr 05, 2004 8:34 pm
Location: Danube, MN

Postby tlm5999 » Aug 17, 2006 8:09 pm

The method that I teach works even with irregular cycles even hiighly irregular. I'm usually 32-60 days, but while BFing it was 17mos after delivery then another 70 days. We then TTC and achieved the first month. It even works through premenopause when it can be many months between cycles.
Valin 05-15-03 HG
Liam 11-19-04 HG
Anna-Marie 9-3-06 Lost an angel
Jonathan Declan 12/28/06 Lost a twin
Declan James 8-8-07 HG
Joseph 6-4-09 non-HG
Image
tlm5999
Opinionated HGer
 
Posts: 671
Joined: Aug 04, 2006 8:33 am
Location: Topeka, KS, USA

Postby IslandDreamer » Aug 18, 2006 12:51 am

I'm sure there will be gals who want to know more as they see this thread.
IslandDreamer
HER Majesty
 
Posts: 9259
Joined: Jul 12, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Texas

Postby JulieinMinn » Sep 17, 2006 6:09 pm

Hi Tracy!

My husband and I just started our NFP class this month. We have had 6HG pregnancies, have tried condoms this last year (we are 16mo pp) and let's just say they stink. Our whole intimate life has stunk this year. Personally, I am TERRIFIED to be pregnant again, although the ofshoot of having one more DOES enter my mind, I really don't think the way I feel now, it will be an option.

I guess I do have a big theological question as I go through our homework (we are on class 1 homework), I am not Catholic, but am a believer and a Bible reader, are you able to take a question regarding NFP in this realm?

Julie :o)
Mom to 5 blessings,1 with the Lord, 6XHG survivor!
JulieinMinn
New Member
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Jun 11, 2006 10:53 pm

Postby mrsbigdog » Sep 19, 2006 2:01 pm

We're using NFP now. Actually we were using it in the past but never took the class - I just read up on my own. Anyway, it worked great for ten years. The failure resulting in our "surprise" was really the result of us doing something we shouldn't have been doing at a bad time. I have now been taking the classes since early summer and am impressed with the knowledge and scientific data this program includes. It does work well as long as you follow the instructions.

Donna
3x HG survivor: Theresa - 11/88, Katie - 1/95, Emily - 1/06
(one HG baby in each of the last three decades! - yes, just call me crazy)

Image
mrsbigdog
HG Diva
 
Posts: 2153
Joined: Jul 24, 2005 8:37 pm
Location: Missouri

Postby tlm5999 » Sep 20, 2006 10:52 pm

Julie,
I pmed you about your question to let you know that I would try to answer it, whatever it may be and I didn't here anything back from you. Did you find and answer? I'd still be interested in hearing the question.
Valin 05-15-03 HG
Liam 11-19-04 HG
Anna-Marie 9-3-06 Lost an angel
Jonathan Declan 12/28/06 Lost a twin
Declan James 8-8-07 HG
Joseph 6-4-09 non-HG
Image
tlm5999
Opinionated HGer
 
Posts: 671
Joined: Aug 04, 2006 8:33 am
Location: Topeka, KS, USA

Postby JulieinMinn » Sep 21, 2006 7:35 am

Hi Tracy,

No, I haven't gotten back to you yet! I have not had much email time since I mailed you. I'll go back this morning and reply to your message. Thanks for picking this up!

Julie :o)
Mom to 5 blessings,1 with the Lord, 6XHG survivor!
JulieinMinn
New Member
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Jun 11, 2006 10:53 pm


Return to No more for me!?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron